![]() ![]() ![]() The second image has more resolution – notice the hairs under the beak – however the difference is a bit harder to see from the web. The second image was then adjusted appropriately for sharpening and noise (for that resolution) with all other settings identical to the first original image. ARW file but was was put through “Adobe Camera Raw Enhance – Super Resolution” resulting in a the original file being upsized to 12000 x 8000 pixels and then I identically cropped the second image to the same proportions as the first – bringing it down to 2404 x 2979. ![]() The first image is produced using the original native resolution with a heavy crop, resulting in a cropped image of 998 x 1209 pixels which is not very many pixels. To me the raw image seems sharp and in focus but lacks detail when compared to the enhanced image. The following two images originate from the same Sony raw ARW file of 6000 x 4000 pixels, shot hand held on a 24 megapixel Sony A9 II at 600 mm, 1/2000 sec at f6.3 from at least 50ft from the subject. Adobe may be on to something with their Super Resolution (pixel doubling) software update in Adobe Camera Raw – especially for wildlife photography which often involves heavy cropping or for those shooting with lower resolution cameras (lets say less than 40 meg pixel) such as the A9. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |